What the

Posted: 31 December, 2011 in Uncategorized

Why  is Brannan assigning Michael Roth’s cases to a “special” prosecutor?  We can only imagine that this is a lawyer who rode the short bus to law school.

Michael Roth is the only person in Quartzsite’s “opposition party” that the Bagger has any respect for.  Even though his Ron Paul brand of libertarianism is batshit crazy, at least he believes it.  And he’s not afraid to tell the other assholes out there that they are full of shit when they compromise their Paulian beliefs for some political expediency.

We don’t agree with Roth’s politics, but we do respect his conviction.

That is all.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. thedogbitchhunter says:

    Michael Roth needs a special prosecutor because he is “special”…a “special” kind of idiot…lucky for us this “special” prosecutor with put his “special” ass in jail were some “special” cell mate will have him take it up the…is this idiot as stupid as he makes out to be…speaking of making out…maybe his cell mate will be nice enough to Mikey to give him a little love before he gives him a lot of pain…good luck you idiot…!

  2. neversmores says:

    I’ve heard this “special” prosecutor is a pit bull that makes Mad Dog Brannan look like a softie! Rumors are that this guy is being asked to run for CA against Samantha, wouldn’t that be sweet?

    Fraudster, Jenny, DooRag Dana, be careful what you wish for, you might just get more than you bargained for.

  3. trespasser says:

    My great friend is a great friend of Mikey’s ex and I’m sure she would love to talk to you, and you can keep you left nut. Sounds like you guys are on the right path….

  4. neversmores says:

    I want to hear more too! Bagger, when you get the details be sure to share, inquiring minds want to know.

    Find out what hotel they are shacking up in as well, I got a Kama Sutra gift box for Christmas and was thinking of re-gifting it to the young couple. And people say I’m not considerate…..

    • Don’t know where they may (or may not) be sharing the honeymoon suite, but we hear Ms. Vederma’am is in Yuma today testifying in Mikey’s domestic relations case. The Bagger would not want to a the victim of a crime prosecuted by Ms. Vederma’am if Mikey were representing the defendant.

  5. desecrateus says:

    Oh Bagger, you so silly. Where did you hear that Vederma’am prosecutes cases? That’s just craziness.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s